Comments on: Building the LAME MP3 Encoder using Visual Studio 8 Express http://wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/2007/12/30/building-the-lame-mp3-encoder-using-visual-studio-8-express/ Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:53:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: topherlafata http://wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/2007/12/30/building-the-lame-mp3-encoder-using-visual-studio-8-express/comment-page-1/#comment-95795 topherlafata Thu, 21 May 2009 22:44:40 +0000 http://www.wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/?p=622#comment-95795 perhaps its the NASM stuff. maybe the solution isnt using NASM perhaps its the NASM stuff. maybe the solution isnt using NASM

]]> By: Bill http://wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/2007/12/30/building-the-lame-mp3-encoder-using-visual-studio-8-express/comment-page-1/#comment-44377 Bill Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:04:05 +0000 http://www.wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/?p=622#comment-44377 That is curious. I will check it out. Maybe I am missing an optimization parameter. That is curious. I will check it out. Maybe I am missing an optimization parameter.

]]> By: erik http://wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/2007/12/30/building-the-lame-mp3-encoder-using-visual-studio-8-express/comment-page-1/#comment-44346 erik Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:52:38 +0000 http://www.wehuberconsultingllc.com/wordpress/?p=622#comment-44346 Thanks for the help. However the distributed 32 bit lame seems to run much faster than my VS2008 one :( distributed lame 0:47 compile lame 1:10 Could not get 64 to compile bufferoverflowU.lib could not open. Thanks for the help.

However the distributed 32 bit lame seems to run much faster than my VS2008 one :(

distributed lame 0:47
compile lame 1:10

Could not get 64 to compile bufferoverflowU.lib could not open.

]]>